PENGARUH PAD DAN DAU TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DENGAN BELANJA MODAL SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING PADA PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN/KOTA  DI PROVINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN

. Lisandri; Fahmi Rizani; Akhmad Yafiz Syam

PENGARUH PAD DAN DAU TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DENGAN BELANJA MODAL SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING PADA PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN/KOTA DI PROVINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN

. Lisandri, Fahmi Rizani, Akhmad Yafiz Syam

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze how PAD and DAU variables are affecting economic growth both directly and indirectly. This paper is important because it differs from previous studies, which generally place economic growth as an exogenous factor, and the results still show inconsistency. While this research puts the variable of economic growth in endogenous position, that is as a factor influenced by public expenditure, which in this context allocation of capital expenditure. The focus of this paper is to describe and answer the question of how the impact of PAD and DAU on Economic Growth through the allocation of Capital Expenditures. PAD is an indicator of local government productivity that is influenced by local government innovation in developing productive assets. However, the results of this study indicate that PAD has no significant effect on capital expenditure allocation. PAD is also an indicator of regional independence in providing financing sources of regional development. Theoretically, the greater the PAD of an area, the more independent the region. But for whatever achievement PAD, if there is inefficiency in the management, the amount of PAD will be absorbed for operational financing, so it does not affect the capital expenditure for investment purposes. DAU has a significant influence on capital expenditure and economic growth. The total effect of DAU on Economic Growth through Capital Expenditure is 0.359 or 36 percent. Indirect influence (0.082 or 82 percent) DAU is greater than direct impact on economic growth (28 percent). This proves that capital expenditure variables are significant as intervening variables in the context of this study.

Keywords

PAD, DAU, Capital Expenditure, Economic Growth

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adiputra, I. M. P., & Dwiyantari, N. K. D. D., Dewa Kadek, 2015. Pengaruh PAD, Dana Perimbangan dan SiLPA Terhadap Kua-litas Pembangunan Manusia Dengan Alokasi Belanja Modal Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi pada Pemerintah Ka-bupaten/Kota di Bali). Seminar Nasional Akuntansi 18 Medan.

Ali, S., Rabbi, F., Hayat, U., & Ali, N., 2013. The composition of public expenditures and economic growth: evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 40(11), 1010-1022. doi:doi:10.1108/IJSE-05-2012-0081

Ardhini. 2011. Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan Daerah terhadap Belanja Modal untuk Pelayanan Publik dalam Perspektif Teori Keagenan (Studi Pada Kabupaten Dan Kota di Jawa Tengah). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Azeem Qureshi, M. 2009. Human develop-ment, public expenditure and economic growth: a system dynamics approach. International Journal of Social Econo-mics, 36(1/2), 93-104.

Azwar, A. 2016. Peran Alokatif Pemerintah melalui Pengadaan Barang/Jasa dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia. Kajian Ekonomi dan Keu-angan, 20(2), 149-167.

Baffes, J., & Shah, A. 1998. Productivity of Public Spending, Sectoral Allocation Choices, and Economic Growth. Econo-mic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 46, No. 2 (January 1998), , pp. 291-303. Retrieved from http://www.jstor. org/stable/10.1086/452339

Barro, R. J. 1991. Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly journal of economics, 106(2), 407-443.

Gillis, M., Perkins, D. H., Roemer, M., & Snod-grass, D. R. 1992. Economics of develop-ment: WW Norton & Company, Inc.

Glenn A Welsch, R. W. H., dan Paul N. Gordon, 1995. Budgeting (Penyusunan Anggaran Perusahaan) Perencanaan dan Pengen-dalian Laba.

Halim, A., 2012. Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah: Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Edisi ke 4. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L., 2012. Orga-nization Theory: Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives: Oxford univer-sity press.

Hidayati, N., 2016. Analisis Pengaruh Pen-dapatan Asli Daerah, Dana Alokasi Umum dan Dana Alokasi Khusus ter-hadap Alokasi Belanja Modal dengan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi sebagai Variabel Moderasi pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Husted, B. W., 2000. A contingency theory of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(1), 24-48.

Jahan, S., Mahmud, A. S., & Papageorgiou, C. ,2014. What Is Keynesian Economics? FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT, September 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2014/09/basics.htm

Maharani, A., & Adi, W. 2013. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Sebelum dan Sesudah Pene-rapan Pola Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Layanan Umum. Jupe-Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 1(3).

Maryam Nur Fajrina, L. S., SE.,M.Si. 2014. Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, PAD dan DAU terhadap Pengalokasian Ang-garan Belanja Modal. Program Studi S1 Akuntansi, FEB Universitas Telkom.

Merina, C. I., & Sari, M., 2016. Determinan Pengalokasian Belanja Modal Dengan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Sebagai Variabel Moderating Pada Pemerintah Provinsi Di Indonesia. Medan: Seminar Nasional Akuntansi.

Otley, D. 1999. Performance Management: a Framework for Management Control Systems Research. Management accoun-ting research, 10(4), 363-382.

Pradita, R. R., & Prastiwi, D. 2012. Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Dana Alo-kasi Umum terhadap Belanja Modal di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Surabaya: Univer-sitas Negeri Surabaya.

Ramayandi, A., 2003. Economic growth and government size in Indonesia: some les-sons for the local authorities. Paper pre-sented at the The 5th IRSA International Comference, Regional Development in The Era of Decentralization: Growth, Poverty, and Environment, Bandung.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A., 2013. Orga-nizational Behavior (15 ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Sahoo, P., Dash, R. K., & Nataraj, G. 2010. Infrastructure development and econo-mic growth in China. Institute of Deve-loping Economies Discussion Paper, 261.

Salih, M. A. R., 2012. The relationship bet-ween economic growth & Government expenditure: Evidence from Sudan: In-ternational Business Research, 5(8), 40.

Shapiro, S. P. 2005. Agency theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 31, 263-284.

Sugiarthi, N. P. D. E. R., & Supadmi, N. L. 2014. Pengaruh PAD, DAU, dan SILPA pada Belanja Modal dengan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi sebagai Pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2).

Suhardjanto, D., Sulistyorini, E. J., & Hartoko, S. 2009. The Influence of Fiscal Decen-tralization on The Public Expenditure In Indonesia. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 13(3).

Sularno, F. M. 2013. Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Dana Alokasi Umum terhadap Peng-alokasian Anggaran Belanja Modal Pada Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Barat.

Tamawiwy, J., Sondakh, J. J., & Warongan, J. D. 2016. Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Belanja Modal Untuk Pelayanan Publik (Studi pada kabupaten dan kota di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing" Goodwill", 7(2).

Wardani, D. S. K., 2012. Pengaruh Pelatihan Komunikasi Efektif untuk Meningkatkan Efikasi Diri Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Perkembangan, 1(2).

Wardhani, R., Rossieta, H., & Martani, D. 2017. Good governance and the impact of government spending on perfor-mance of local government in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 3(1), 77-102.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. 1990. Posi-tive accounting theory: a ten year pers-pective. Accounting review, 131-156.

Yunus, O. M., Bustaman, H. A., & Rashdi, W. F. A. W. M. 2014. Conducive business environment: Local government inno-vative work behavior. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 214-220.

Whittaker, James B. 1995. The Government Performance and Result Act of 1993: A Mandate for Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement, Educational Services Institut: Arlington, Virginia.