Komparasi Kinerja Capital Asset Pricing Model, Three Factors Pricing Model, dan Four Factor Pricing Model

Siti Masitah, Asrid Juniar


This study aims to compare the performance of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), three-factor pricing model, and four factors pricing model for estimating expected returns. Firstly, this study examines the factors which are contained in the three models. The objective of the study is to choose  The Best Asset Pricing Model for Estimating the expected return. 132 samples are consisting of all sectors which are listed in The Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2015-2017. This study uses T-test and F test to test the hypotheses which are hypothesis 1, hypothesis 2 and hypothesis 3, to test the hypotheses which are hypothesis 4 and hypothesis 5 using other statistical analysis tools, Analysis of variance (ANOVA), by quantifying the standard deviation of each model. The results show that (1) Market excess return factor in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has an effect on stock return, (2) market excess return, size premium and value premium factors in Three Factors Pricing Model have an effect on stock returns simultaneously, (3) market excess return, size premium, value premium and momentum factors in Four Factors Pricing Model have an effect on stock return simultaneously, (4) Based on the standard deviation value of the three models indicates that the Three Factors Pricing Model is better to explain the estimated rate of return than the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), (5) and Four Factors Pricing Model is better to explain the estimated rate of return than the Three Factors Pricing Model.


Capital Asset Pricing Model; Four Factors Pricing Model; Three Factors Pricing Model.

Full Text:



Banz, R. W. 1981. The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economic 9, 3-18.

Bartholdy J, dan. Peare P. 2005. Estimation of expected return: CAPM vs Fama and French. International Review of Financial Analysis. 14, 407-427

Bello, Z. 2008. A Statistical Comparison of The Capm To The Fama-French Three Factor Model And The Carhart's Model. Global Journal of Finance And Banking 2 (2), 14-24.

Bhatnagar, S.C., and Ramlogan, R. 2012. The Capital Asset Pricing Model Versus The Three Factor Model: A United Kingdom. Perspective International Jour-nal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR). Volume 2, No. 1

Carhart, M. M. 1997. On persistence in mu-tual fund performance. Journal of Fi-nance 52, 57-82

Elbannan, M. A. 2015. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: An Overview of The Theory. International Canadian Center of Science and Education 7, no. 1, 222.

Fama, E.F, dan French, K. 1993. Common Risk Factor in The Return on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Finance Economic 33: 3-56.

Fama, E.F, dan French, R.F. 1995. Size and Book to Market Factors in earning and Return. Journal of Finance 50 (1), 131-155.

Fama, E.F, dan French, R.F. 2016. Dissecting Anonalies with a Five-Factor Model. Review of Financial Studies 29. 70-103

Fama, E.F, dan French, R.F. 2017. Interna-tional Tests of a Five-Factor Asset Pric-ing Model. Journal of Financial Econom-ics. Volume 123, Issue 3, pp: 441-463

Ghozali, I. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21. Edisi Tujuh. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.

Hartono, J. 2010. Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi. Edisi Tujuh. BPFE. Yogyakarta.

Husnan, S. 2015. Dasar-dasar Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Sekuritas. AMP YKPN. Yogyakarta.

Jagandish N, d. 1993. Returns to Buying Winners And Selling Losers: Implications For Stock Market Efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48, 65-91.

Karp, A., and Gary van Vuuren, V. G., 2017. The Capital Asset Pricing Model And Fama-French Three Factor Model In An Emerging Market Environment. International Business & Economics Re-search Journal Third Quarter 2017 Vol-ume 16, Number 3.

Liew, J. dan Vassalou, M. 2000. Can Book-To-Market Size And Momentum Be Risk Factors That Predict Economic Growth?. Journal of Financial Economic 57, 221-245.

Lintner, J. 1965. The Valuation of Risk As-sets and the Selection of Risky Invest-ments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 13-37

Markowitz, H. 1952. Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1: pp. 77-91

Mossin, J. 1969. Security Pricing and In-vestment Criteria in Competitive Mar-kets. American Economic Review. 1969, vol. 59, issue 5, 749-56

Quthbi, H.Z. 2017. Analisis Saham Syariah Efisien dengan Pendekatan Shari’a Compliant Asset Pricing Model (SCAPM) pada Jakarta Islamic Index (JII). Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam – Volume 8, Nomor 1 (2017): 131-147 ISSN 2085-9325 (print); 2541-4666 (online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/ economi-ca.2017.8.1.

Setiadi, Doni. dan Rifani, Ahmad. 2018. Aplikasi Komputer Statistik dengan SPSS untuk Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Rajawali Pers. Depok.

Sharpe, W. 1964. Capital Asset Price : A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, issue 3, 425-442

Tandelilin, Eduardus. 2010. Portofolio dan Investasi. Edisi Pertama. BPFE. Yogya-karta.

http://www.idx.co.id/(diakses pada tang-gal 20 Maret 2018)

https://Finance.yahoo.com/(diakses pada tanggal 20 Maret 2018)

http://www.bi.go.id/(diaksese pada tang-gal 24 April 2018


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
STIE Indonesia Banjarmasin


Image result for address iconSTIE Indonesia Banjarmasin, Jl. H. Hasan Basry No. 9 11 Kayutangi Banjarmasin, 70234
Image result for address blue iconspread@stiei-kayutangi-bjm.ac.id
Image result for address iconhttp://journal.stiei-kayutangi-bjm.ac.id/index.php/jibk/.
Image result for address blue iconPhone 085248255677






Creative Commons License

STIE Indonesia Banjarmasin is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright ©2019 STIE Indonesia Banjarmasin of Powered by Open Journal Systems.